TTABlog Running Index: January 2025 to Date
E-mail subscriptions to the TTABlog are available. Just enter your e-mail address in the box on the right to receive a daily update via Feedblitz. Please report any broken or inoperative links, as well as any errors and omissions, to the TTABlogger at jwelch at wolfgreenfield.com.
Section 2(d) - Likelihood of Confusion:- TTAB Reverses Section 2(d) Refusal of FITO for Seeds Due to Dissimilarity of Marks and 13th DuPont Factor (Strategic Partners)
- Opposer Proves Prior Use of Common Law REVOLUTION JEWELRY WORKS Marks, Wins Opposition Battle
- TTABlog Test: How Did These Three Recent Section 2(d) Appeals Turn Out?
- In 2024, What Was The Rate of TTAB Affirmance of Section 2(d) Refusals to Register?
- In 2024, How Often Did the TTAB Affirm Section 2(e)(1) Mere Descriptiveness/Disclaimer Refusals?
- Precedential No. 30: Illustration of Block Puzzle Merely Descriptive of Computer Game Software, Says TTAB
- TTAB Affirms 2e5 Functionality Refusal of Fire Extinguisher Pressure Gauge Configuration, Despite Applicant's Design Patent
- CAFC Affirms TTAB: Pink Color De Jure Functional for Hip Joint Implants
- Precedential No. 1: TTAB Upholds USPTO Objections to Over-Inclusive Drawings for Watch Configuration Marks
Section 2(f) - Acquired Distinctiveness: Section 14(3) - Misrepresentation of Source: Prosecution Issues: Discovery/Evidence/Procedure: CAFC Decisions: Other:
Text © John L. Welch 2025.
<< Home