2014 TTAB Precedential Decisions
E-mail subscriptions to the TTABlog are available. Just enter your e-mail address in the box on the right to receive a daily update via Feedblitz. You may also follow the blog on Twitter (here). And don't forget to leave your comments! [Note that E-mail subscribers may gave to surf to the blog to see comments]. Please report any broken or inoperative links, as well as any errors and omissions, to the TTABlogger at jwelch at lalaw.com.
Section 2(a) - Immoral or Scandalous:
- WYHA? Precedential No. 28: Finding "MOMSBANGTEENS" Scandalous for Adult Website, TTAB Affirms Section 2(a) Refusal
- Precedential No. 25: Finding ASSHOLE REPELLENT for Gag Gift to Be Vulgar, TTAB Affirms 2(a) Refusal
Section 2(c) - Consent of Living Individual:
Section 2(d) - Likelihood of Confusion:
- Precedential No. 44: TTAB Test - Are "REDNECK RACEGIRL & Design" and "RACEGIRL" Confusable for Clothing?
- Precedential No. 40: TTAB Finds "MC" Family Famous, Sustains Dilution Opposition to MCSWEET for Pickled Vegetables
- Precedential No. 31: Fame of HARRY WINSTON Mark Crushes Son's BRUCE WINSTON Application for Jewelry
- Precedential No. 24: Finding Pepper Sauce and Agave Sweetener Related, TTAB Affirms 2(d) Refual of "CHANTICO & Design"
- Precedential No. 21: IKEA Gets Split Decision Against AKEA: Section 2(d), Yes in Part; Dilution, No
- Precedential No. 9: MINERS For Professional Baseball Goods Confusable With MINERS For Collegiate Sports Goods
- Precedential No. 5: "Family of Marks" Doctrine Inapplicable in Ex Parte Context, Says TTAB
- Precedential No. 1: Fame of SHAPE Magazine Yields 2(d) Opposition Victory over SHAPES for Beauty Salons
Section 2(e)(1)) - Mere Descriptiveness:
- Precedential No. 30: YOUR CLOUD Merely Descriptive of Cloud Computing-Related Services, Says TTAB
- Precedential No. 20: TTAB Affirms Mere Descriptiveness Refusal of TOURBILLON & Design for Jewelry and Watches
- Precedential No. 17: Is PERKS Generic For Volume Discount Buying Services? [No] Merely Descriptive? [Yes]
Section 2(e)(2) - Primarily Geographically Descriptive:
Section 2(f) - Acquired Distinctiveness:
Dilution:
- Precedential No. 23: CHANEL for Real Estate Services Dilutes Famous CHANEL Mark, Says TTAB
- Precedential No. 21: IKEA Gets Split Decision Against AKEA: Section 2(d), Yes in Part; Dilution, No
- Precedential No. 42: Board Grants 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss Fraud, Nonuse, and Abandonment Counterclaims
- Precedential No. 41: Finding Fraud, TTAB Sustains Opposition to NATIONSTAR for Real Estate Brokerage Services
Genericness:
- Precedential No. 32: TTAB Finds CLOUDTV Generic for ... Guess What?
- Precedential No. 17: Is PERKS Generic For Volume Discount Buying Services? [No] Merely Descriptive? [Yes]
- Precedential No. 11: TTAB Affirms Genericness Refusal of CHURRASCOS (Stylized) for Restaurant Services
- Precedential No. 6: TTAB Finds PRETZEL CRISPS Generic for Pretzel Crackers
Identification of Goods:
Ownership:
- Precedential No. 29: After Partnership Breakup, TTAB Declares FAIRWAY FOX Application Void Ab Initio
- Precedential No. 16: TTAB Orders Cancellation of Registration - Applicant not Owner of Underlying Foreign Registration
- Precedential No. 38: TTAB Deems "BEAUTV" Use-Based Application Void Ab Initio Due To Non-Use
- Precedential No. 37: TTAB Affirms Rejection of Web Page Specimen for Computer Services
- Precedential No. 36: TTAB Reverses Refusal of Service Mark Specimen for Financial Services
- Precedential No. 8: Catalogs Lacked Necessary Ordering Information to Qualify as Trademark Specimen, Says TTAB
Concurrent Use:
- Precedential No. 14: Junior User Awarded Concurrent Use Registration for Entire Country Except New Jersey and New York
- Precedential No. 2: In Concurrent Use Ruling, TTAB Okays Nationwide Registration Even Though Services Never Performed in NYC or CT
- Precedential No. 45: TTAB Grants Motion to Amend Opposition to Section 66(a) Application
- Precedential No. 43: TTAB Dismisses XBOX 360 Cancellation Petition as Sanction for Misconduct
- Precedential No. 42: Board Grants 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss Fraud, Nonuse, and Abandonment Counterclaims
- Precedential No. 38: TTAB Deems "BEAUTV" Use-Based Application Void Ab Initio Due To Non-Use
- Precedential No. 35: Filing of Opposition by Foreign Attorney is Curable Defect, Says TTAB
- Precedential No. 34: TTAB Grants Motion to Strike Belated Supplemental Expert Report
- Precedential No. 33: Party Withdraws Designation of Testifying Expert Who Provided Report: No Deposition Allowed, Says TTAB
- Precedential No. 27: TTAB Rules that Notice of Reliance Must Indicate Relevance of Each Document by duPont Factor
- Precedential No. 18: Identity of One Party's Trial Witnesses Cannot Be Kept Secret from Other Party
- Precedential No. 15: TTAB Dismisses Opposition Under Rule 2.132(a) For Failure To Prosecute
- Precedential No. 10: TTAB Denies Motion to Compel Due to Lack of Good Faith Effort to Resolve Dispute
- Precedential No. 7: TTAB Enters Judgment as Sanction For Intransigent Defendant's Failure to Attend Discovery Conference
- Precedential No. 4: Section 18 Available for Restriction of Color Mark to a Particular Shade, Says TTAB
Text Copyright John L. Welch 2014.
<< Home