TTAB 2008 Precedential Decisions
Here is a compilation of this year's precedential decisions, categorized according to subject matter.

Section 2(a) - Disparagement:
- Precedential No. 52: TTAB Affirms 2(a) Disparagement Refusal of "HEEB" for Clothing and Entertainment Services
- Precedential No. 41: Red Sox See No Humor in "SEX ROD" for Clothing; TTAB Finds Lack of Bona Fide Intent and Deems Mark Vulgar, Disparaging
Section 2(a) - Suggesting a False Connection:
- Precedential No. 42: TTAB Reverses 2(a) False Connection Refusal of "MARIA CALLAS" for Jewelry
- Precedential No. 41: Red Sox See No Humor in "SEX ROD" for Clothing; TTAB Finds Lack of Bona Fide Intent and Deems Mark Vulgar, Disparaging
- Precedential No. 23: Finding a (2)(a) False Connection, TTAB Cancels "TWIGGY" Registration for Clothing
Section 2(a) - Scandalous:
Section 2(d) - Likelihood of Confusion:
- Precedential No. 46: TTAB Affirms 2(d) Refusals of "RSI" Design Mark for Ink Jet Printers
- Precedential No. 41: Red Sox See No Humor in "SEX ROD" for Clothing; TTAB Finds Lack of Bona Fide Intent and Deems Mark Vulgar, Disparaging
- Precedential No. 23: Finding a (2)(a) False Connection, TTAB Cancels "TWIGGY" Registration for Clothing
- Precedential No. 40: "SAM EDELMAN" Confusingly Similar to "EDELMAN" for Handbags, Says TTAB
- Precedential No. 37: Judge Rogers Beams as Section 2(d) Case is Tried Without Discovery
- Precedential No. 21: TTAB Finds "LA PEREGRINA" and "THE PILGRIM" Confusingly Similar for Jewelry Per Doctrine of Foreign Equivalents
- Precedential No. 18: TTAB Dismisses "SPORTSMAN'S WAREHOUSE" Cancellation Petition, Finding No Likelihood of Confusion and No Fraud
- Precedential No. 17: Finding the Marks Entirely Different, TTAB Grants Judgment on the Pleadings in 2(d) Opposition
- Precedential No. 16: TTAB Sustains Opposition to ITU Application, Applicant Lacked Bona Fide Intent
- Precedential No. 10: TTAB Sustains "VITAMILK" 2(d) Opposition, Again Rejects a Morehouse Defense
Section 2(e)(1) - Mere Descriptiveness:
- Precedential No. 54: "DEC" Merely Descriptive of Nuclear Decay Batteries, Says TTAB
- Precedential No. 47: "BOBBLE POPS" Merely Descriptive of Candy, Says TTAB, Colorfully
- Precedential No. 32: Double Entendre Argument Remedies "THE FARMACY" 2(e)(1) Refusal, Says TTAB
- Precedential No. 29: TTAB Affirms 2(e)(1) Refusal of Japanese Term Meaning "Walking" for Footwear
- Precedential No. 1: TTAB Reverses Mere Descriptiveness Refusal of "SUGAR No. 11" For Futures Exchange Services and Finds Specimen of Use Acceptable
Section 2(e)(2) - Primarily Geographically Descriptive:
Section 2(e)(3) - Primarily Geographically Deceptively Misdescriptive:
- Precedential No. 44: TTAB Sustains 2(e)(3) Opposition to "HAVANA CLUB" for Cigars Made From Cuban Seed Tobacco
- Precedential No. 12: TTAB Sustains 2(e)(3) Opposition to "GUANTANAMERA" for Non-Cuban Cigars, Folk Song Notwithstanding
- Precedential No. 6: TTAB Clarifies Doctrine of Equivalents, Affirms 2(e)(3) Refusal of "MOSKOVSKAYA" for Vodka
- Precedential No. 4: TTAB Affirms Triple Refusal of "NORMANDIE CAMEMBERT" for Cheese
Section 2(f) - Acquired Distinctiveness:

Abandonment:
Failure to Function:
- Precedential No. 31: TTAB Reviews Specimen Brochure, Affirms Failure-to-Function Refusal
- Precedential No. 26: Specimens of Use Display Web Address, Not Service Mark Use
- Precedential No. 20: TTAB Finds Stitching Design on Jean Pockets Merely Ornamental
Fraud:
- Precedential No. 35: Despite Amendment of Application, TTAB Sustains Fraud Claim in "GRAND CANYON WEST" Opposition
- Precedential No. 27: Correction of Error in Goods Prior to Publication Creates Rebuttable Presumption of No Fraud, Says TTAB
- Precedential No. 18: TTAB Dismisses "SPORTSMAN'S WAREHOUSE" Cancellation Petition, Finding No Likelihood of Confusion and No Fraud
- Precedential No. 13: FRAUD! TTAB Cancels Four Registrations on Summary Judgment: Attorney Signed False Statements of Use
Genericness:
- Precedential No. 24: TTAB Affirms Genericness Refusal of "BOND-OST" for Cheese
- Precedential No. 15: TTAB Again Affirms Genericness Refusal of "HOTELS.COM" for ... Guess What?
- Precedential No. 11: TTAB Finds "REDUCER" Generic for Flow Meters
Lack of Bona Fide Intent:
- Precedential No. 41: Red Sox See No Humor in "SEX ROD" for Clothing; TTAB Finds Lack of Bona Fide Intent and Deems Mark Vulgar, Disparaging
- Precedential No. 16: TTAB Sustains Opposition to ITU Application, Applicant Lacked Bona Fide Intent
Ownership:
Pan American Convention:
Phantom Mark:
Procedural Issues:
- Precedential No. 55: TTAB Denies Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment Because Briefs Exceeded Page Limit
- Precedential No. 51: TTAB Dismisses Morehouse and Laches Defenses, Denies Summary Judgment in 2(d) Opposition
- Precedential No. 50: TTAB Grants Motion to Compel Proper Initial Disclosures
- Precedential No. 49: Failure to Serve Notices of Opposition Leads to Swift TTAB Dismissal
- Precedential No. 48: TTAB Resolves Procedural Spat Over Discovery Conference
- Precedential No. 45: TTAB Denies Petitioner's Motion to Amend, Grants Respondent's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings
- Precedential No. 43: Absent TTAB Order, No Sanction for Failure to Provide Initial Disclosures
- Precedential No. 39: Evidentiary Errors Lead to Dismissal of 2(d) Opposition for Failure to Prove Priority
- Precedential No. 38: TTAB Dismisses Opposition as Untimely - Electronic Payment Incomplete and Faxed Filing Ineffective
- Precedential No. 34: TTAB Okays Stipulation Between Red Sox and "RAD SEX" Applicant to Waive Initial Disclosures
- Precedential No. 17: Finding the Marks Entirely Different, TTAB Grants Judgment on the Pleadings in 2(d) Opposition
- Precedential No. 9: TTAB Issues Non-Ultimate Sanctions for Failure To Comply With Board Order Compelling Document Production
- Precedential No. 7: TTAB Dismisses 2(d) and Dilution Opposition for Lack of Evidence and Inadequate Pleading
- Precedential No. 5: TTAB Dismisses Opposition for Opposer's Failure to Serve Prior to Filing
- Precedential No. 3: NFL Thrown for a Loss as TTAB Denies Request to Extend Discovery
- Precedential No. 2: TTAB Issues Sanctions For Discovery Abuses

Res Judicata/Collateral Estoppel:
Rule 2.61(b) - PTO Demand for Information:
Single Artistic Work:
Specimens of Use/Drawing:
- Precedential No. 36: Finding Specimen Doesn't Match Drawing, TTAB Affirms Refusal of "UPPER 90" for Clothing
- Precedential No. 33: TTAB Affirms Refusal of "FREEDOM STONE" for Cornerstones as Title of a Single Work
- Precedential No. 28: TTAB Finds Drawings OK, But Packing Label Specimen Fails to Show Service Mark Use
- Precedential No. 14: TTAB Affirms Three Refusals: Website Specimens Fail to Show Trademark Use
- Precedential No. 1: TTAB Reverses Mere Descriptiveness Refusal of "SUGAR No. 11" For Futures Exchange Services and Finds Specimen of Use Acceptable
Use in Commerce:
<< Home