TTABlog Quarterly Index: January - March 2025
E-mail subscriptions to the TTABlog are available. Just enter your e-mail address in the box on the right to receive a daily update via Feedblitz. Please report any broken or inoperative links, as well as any errors and omissions, to the TTABlogger at jwelch at wolfgreenfield.com.
Section 2(a) Deceptiveness: Section 2(c) - Consent of Living Individual: Section 2(d) - Likelihood of Confusion:- TTABlog Test: Is KINGS ARMOR Confusable with UNDER ARMOUR for Clothing?
- TTABlog Test: Are Sexual Arousal Supplements Related to Hair Care Products Under Section 2(d)? [Yes]
- TTABlog Test: Is STEED COMPANY Confusable with CORCEL for Clothing? [Yes]
- TTAB Upholds 2(d) and 2(e)(4) Bifusal of WYSE LONDON for Clothing
- TTABlog Test: How Did These Three Recent Section 2(d) Appeals Turn Out?
- TTAB Denies Section 2(d) Cancellation Petition due to Unconvincing Testimony Regarding Priority
- TTABlog Test: Which of These Three Section 2(d) Refusals Was/Were Overturned on Appeal?
- Finding Restaurant Services Related to Paper Food Containers, TTAB Sustains DON'T MESS WITH TEX-MEX Opposition
- TTABlog Test: Is CLEANFACE Confusable with DR.BELMEUR CLEAN FACE for Beauty Products? [No]
- TTABlog Test: Are Educational Services for Incarcerated Individuals Related to Legal Services Under Section 2(d)? [Yes]
- TTABlog Test: Are Cosmetics Related to Bottled Water for Section 2(d) Purposes?
- TTABlog Test: Are Pizza Parlors and Baked Goods Related Under Section 2(d)? [Yes]
- RTC RICH TRAPPERS CLUB Logo Not Confusable with RTC for Clothing, Says TTAB
- Eleven Third-Party Uses of "Cowbell" Not Enough to Overcome Cited COWBELL CREAM ALE Registration
- TTABlog Test: How Did These Three Recent Section 2(d) Appeals Turn Out?
- TTABlog Test: Which of These Three Section 2(d) Refusals Was/Were Overturned on Appeal?
- TTAB Reverses Section 2(d) Refusal of "12 & Design" for Cosmetics Due to Third-Party Registration Evidence
- TTAB Reverses USPTO's Section 2(d) Refusal of PBE AWARDS & Design for Marketing Award Services
- E.D. Va. Reverses TTAB's Precedential Decision in HME Opposition, Orders USPTO to Issue Registration
- TTABlog Test: How Did These Three Recent Section 2(d) Appeals Turn Out
- TTAB Reverses Section 2(d) Refusal of FITO for Seeds Due to Dissimilarity of Marks and 13th DuPont Factor (Strategic Partners)
- Opposer Proves Prior Use of Common Law REVOLUTION JEWELRY WORKS Marks, Wins Opposition Battle
- TTABlog Test: How Did These Three Recent Section 2(d) Appeals Turn Out?
- In 2024, What Was The Rate of TTAB Affirmance of Section 2(d) Refusals to Register?
- TTABlog Test: How Did These Recent Section 2(e)(1) Mere Descriptiveness Appeals Turn Out?
- In 2024, How Often Did the TTAB Affirm Section 2(e)(1) Mere Descriptiveness/Disclaimer Refusals?
- Precedential No. 30: Illustration of Block Puzzle Merely Descriptive of Computer Game Software, Says TTAB
- TTAB Upholds 2(d) and 2(e)(4) Bifusal of WYSE LONDON for Clothing
- TTABlog Test: Is SELECT BY LANDRY'S Primarily Merely a Surname for a Customer Reward Program?
- TTAB Lets Stand Bifusal of Leveling Leg Configuration: De Jure Functional and Non-Distinctive
- TTAB Affirms 2e5 Functionality Refusal of Fire Extinguisher Pressure Gauge Configuration, Despite Applicant's Design Patent
- CAFC Affirms TTAB: Pink Color De Jure Functional for Hip Joint Implants
- Precedential No. 1: TTAB Upholds USPTO Objections to Over-Inclusive Drawings for Watch Configuration Marks
Section 2(f) - Acquired Distinctiveness: Section 14(3) - Misrepresentation of Source: Abandonment/Nonuse/Specimen of Use:
- TTAB Finds "RUFFAREE" T-Shirt Specimen Acceptable for Dog Park Services
- TTAB Denies "DISORDERLY FASHION" Nonuse Cancellation Petition: It's Hard to Prove a Negative
- PANERA Fails to Prove Fame Before Applicant's First Use Date, TTAB Dismisses Opposition to PANERALUX for Unrelated Products
- Porn Star Name GIGI DIOR Dilutes-by-Blurring Famous DIOR Mark
- TTABlog Test: Is MUSH Generic for Oat-Based Cereals? [Yes]
- TTAB Finds "BRILLIANT ROSE" Generic for . . . Guess What?
- TTAB Finds MENTCHEES Generic for .... Guess What?
- Applicant Contractually Barred from Using Mark in 11 Metro Areas Still Entitled to Registration
- On Summary Judgment TTAB Sustains Opposition: Applicant Merely Re-packaged Branded Goods and so Does Not Own the Mark
- TTAB Grants Petition to Cancel VIVACE Registration for Microneedling Device: Manufacturer Owns the Mark, Not Distributor
- Precedential No. 3: Dismissal with Prejudice but Without Judgment Suffices for Claim Preclusion Defense
- Res Judicata Thwarts Applicant Seeking to End Run Prior Opposition by Limiting Services in Second Applications
- CAFC Affirms TTAB's MONEY MART Decision, Confirming that Zone of Natural Expansion Doctrine Applies Only Defensively
- CAFC Affirms TTAB's Dismissal of BULLSHINE FIREBULL Opposition Despite Commercial Strength of FIREBALL for Whisky
- CAFC Hears Oral Arguments in FUCK and RAPUNZEL Appeals
- CAFC Affirms TTAB: Pink Color De Jure Functional for Hip Joint Implants
- Current Roster of TTAB Judges
- The Trademark Reporter's 2025 "Annual Review" of U.S. Trademark Cases
- TTAB Posts March 2025 Hearing Schedule
- Three Recent Inter Partes Proceedings: The Bigger They Are ....
- TTAB Posts February 2025 Hearing Schedule
- TTAB Chief Judge Gerard F. Rogers Retires; Thomas V. Shaw Appointed Acting Chief Judge
- The Top Ten TTAB Decisions of 2024 (Part II)
- The Top Ten TTAB Decisions of 2024 (Part I)
Text © John L. Welch 2025.